An Agreement To Count Slaves As Three-Fifths Of A Person Was Related To Brainly

An Agreement To Count Slaves As Three-Fifths Of A Person Was Related To Brainly

Many states have begun to devalue the value of the country to reduce their taxes. A committee was set up to correct the situation by applying the distribution of taxes among the population of the State. However, this idea was confronted with controversy over how slaves should be taken into account in the distribution process and about the actual relationship between slaves and free men at that time. It is true that the idea of five-thirds does not fit the mantra “one person, one voice” of which the nation is proud. But the exact legal meaning of this sentence is still unclear, which is why the Supreme Court will reconsider it during the next term at Evenwel v. Abbott. Whites were able to keep control of blacks by being allowed to possess and bear arms, while it was almost impossible for slaves to defend themselves against their oppressors. Until the abolition of slavery, blacks were considered only three-fifths of a person and could not enjoy constitutional rights, whether they had been released or not. This plan should be limited in time, because it is not a question of permanently installing historical equivalence, but of erasing the structural disadvantages. The weighted vote could be set at a certain period of years, say 24, which is only about a third of the number of years the three-fifths compromise was in force.

This period would include several presidential, legislative, legislative, local and local elections, as well as referendums. Any elected office, regardless of its mandate, would face multiple elections, giving their constituencies the opportunity to hold their representatives to account. Through a compromise between southern slavers who wanted to have slave blacks in the population to strengthen Congressional southern representation and whites in the North who did not, the authors enshrined the three-fifths clause in the Constitution. This agreement set the censorship value of a slave at 60 percent of the value of a free person. Even after the 13th Amendment to the Constitution neutralized the political (and moral) compromise by abolishing slavery, Jim Crow laws, which violated the guarantee of equality of the 14th Amendment to the Constitution, prevented blacks from voting. The only answer today is to reverse this relationship….


Comments are closed.