Is Email Agreement Legally Binding Philippines

Is Email Agreement Legally Binding Philippines

The Republic Act No. 8792 or the Electronic Commerce Act of 2000 and its implementing rules are at the heart of the country`s electronic commerce legislation. The Law on Electronic Commerce should make electronic contracts legally enforceable and counterbalance legal doubts about the legality of forms of electronic contracting. It recognizes electronic documents as the legal equivalent to paper documents and electronic signatures as the legal equivalent of handwritten signatures. The Appeal Division unanimously upheld the trial`s decision and found that, under general contract law, Greene clearly had the power to settle the case on Gelco`s behalf, and his email set out the essential terms of the agreement, contained an expression of mutual consent, and did not submit conditions such as the outcome of the application for summary judgment. Asked whether the email was a sufficient subscriber letter to establish a binding settlement agreement, the Appeal Division stated: “Given the now widespread use of emails as a form of written communication, both personally and professionally, it would be unreasonable to conclude that electronic messages are not able to: Meet the criteria of the [New York Law] simply because they cannot be physically signed in the traditional way.┬áThe appeal division focused on signing “Thank you Brenda Greene” at the end of the email, proving a “useful” signature of the message, based on the motivation and intent of the New Yorker Electronic Signatures and Records Act (i.e. The New York version of the Uniform Electronic Transactions Act, which governs the validity of electronic contracts and signatures). Most people think of contracts as formal agreements recorded and signed in writing by the parties involved, often with lawyers present, but the fact is that a contract is just an agreement between several parties on the exchange of valuables and the physical form of the contract is not so important. The next day, Forcelli signed a notarized release by his lawyer in which he stated that he was releasing Gelco from all actions related to the accident in exchange for $230,000.


Comments are closed.